Included in Multi-Million Advocates Forum
Aghavni Kasparian is a nationally recognized attorney and has been selected for inclusion in the Multi-Million Advocates Forum. Her practice focuses on the representation of personal
injury victims before state and federal courts at both
the trial and appellate levels. Aghavni Kasparian is an
advocate for individuals injured as a result of car accidents, slip-and-fall incidents, aviation accidents, and defective products.
Education
- UCLA, summa cum laude graduate
-
Loyola Law School of Los Angeles, California, cum laude graduate, number 11th in a class of 394
- Articles Editor of Loyola Law Review
Experienced in Other Forms of Litigation
She also stands up for employees who have suffered
discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, or
other unfair employment practices at the hands of their
employers. Aghavni Kasparian also practices business and
commercial litigation.
Litigating Multi-Million Dollar Cases
Prior to forming KP Law, Aghavni Kasparian was a partner
in a products liability and mass tort litigation law firm in Los Angeles,
California, where she litigated and managed all aspects
of state and federal personal injury, product
liability, wrongful death, premises liability, and property damage cases. She handled
numerous multi-million dollar cases,
representing some of the largest companies and their
insurance carriers throughout the United States and
abroad.
Attentive and Reputable Legal Tactics
Attorney Aghavni Kasparian knows how to aggressively
fight and effectively litigate for her clients like few other plaintiffs' attorneys can. With over 15 years of experience as a former
high-level defense attorney, she possesses the insight
and understanding necessary to anticipate defense
strategies, respond to their tactics, and predict their
valuation of cases.
Associations
- Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles
Published Cases
-
Dardengo v. Honeywell International, Inc. (In re Air
Crash Over Mid-Atlantic), 792 F.Supp.2d 1090 (N.D.
Cal. 2011) (involving motion to dismiss based upon forum non conveniens)
-
In re Air Crash at Madrid, Spain, 893 F.Supp.2d 1020
(C.D. Cal. 2011) (involving motion to dismiss based upon forum non
conveniens)
-
Spanair S.A. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 172
Cal.App.4th 348 (2009) (involving motion to dismiss based upon failure to
prosecute)
Published Articles
-
“Attempts to Avoid Forum Non Conveniens
Rejected,” American Bar Association, Mass Torts Litigation
Section, Vol. 11, No. 4, September 2013 (co-author
Mark R. Irvine)
-
“Defending Claims of Knowing Misrepresentation
Under the General Aviation Revitalization Act,” Aircraft Builders Council, Inc. Law Report (Fall
2011)
-
“Preemption: Restricting the Field of Air
Safety,” Aircraft Builders Council, Inc. Law Report (Fall
2008) (co-author Stephanie B. Gonzalez).
Admitted to the Following Courts
- State Bar of California
- United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
-
United States District Court, Central District of
California
-
United States District Court, Southern District of
California
-
United States District Court, Eastern District of
California
-
United States District Court, Northern District of
California
-
Multiple District Courts around the country on a Pro
Hac Vice basis
